You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Year-round movements of sympatric Fork-tailed (Oceanodroma furcata ) and Leach's (O. leucorhoa ) storm-petrels
Journal of Field Ornithology, July 2018
Luke R. Halpin, Ingrid L. Pollet, Christopher Lee, Ken H. Morgan, Harry R. Carter
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|United Arab Emirates||1||3%|
|Members of the public||22||65%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||6%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||10||22%|
|Student > Master||8||17%|
|Student > Bachelor||5||11%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||16||35%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||2%|
|Sports and Recreations||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,955,994 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Field Ornithology
of 502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 334,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Field Ornithology
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,955,994 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.