You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validity of subjective smoking status in orthopedic patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s86212 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Bender, Patrick Haubruck, Sonja Boxriker, Sebastian Korff, Gerhard Schmidmaier, Arash Moghaddam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 23% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 55% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2015.
All research outputs
#17,113,100
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#805
of 1,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,362
of 277,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#33
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.