↓ Skip to main content

Acute Respiratory Failure in Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute Respiratory Failure in Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Courtney M. Rowan, Jennifer McArthur, Deyin D. Hsing, Shira J. Gertz, Lincoln S. Smith, Ashley Loomis, Julie C. Fitzgerald, Mara E. Nitu, Elizabeth A. S. Moser, Christine N. Duncan, Kris M. Mahadeo, Jerelyn Moffet, Mark W. Hall, Emily L. Pinos, Robert F. Tamburro, Ira M. Cheifetz

Abstract

Acute respiratory failure is common in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and has a high mortality. However, respiratory prognostic markers have not been adequately evaluated for this population. Our objectives are to assess respiratory support strategies and indices of oxygenation and ventilation in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and investigate how these strategies are associated with mortality. Retrospective, multicenter investigation. Twelve U.S. pediatric centers. Pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with respiratory failure. None. Two-hundred twenty-two subjects were identified. PICU mortality was 60.4%. Nonsurvivors had higher peak oxygenation index (38.3 [21.3-57.6] vs 15.0 [7.0-30.7]; p < 0.0001) and oxygen saturation index (24.7 [13.8-38.7] vs 10.3 [4.6-21.6]; p < 0.0001), greater days with FIO2 greater than or equal to 0.6 (2.4 [1.0-8.5] vs 0.8 [0.3-1.6]; p < 0.0001), and more days with oxygenation index greater than 18 (1.4 [0-6.0] vs 0 [0-0.3]; p < 0.0001) and oxygen saturation index greater than 11 (2.0 [0.5-8.8] vs 0 [0-1.0]; p < 0.0001). Nonsurvivors had higher maximum peak inspiratory pressures (36.0 cm H2O [32.0-41.0 cm H2O] vs 30.0 cm H2O [27.0-35.0 cm H2O]; p < 0.0001) and more days with peak inspiratory pressure greater than 31 cm H2O (1.0 d [0-4.0 d] vs 0 d [0-1.0 d]; p < 0.0001). Tidal volume per kilogram was not different between survivors and nonsurvivors. In this cohort of pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with respiratory failure in the PICU, impaired oxygenation and use of elevated ventilator pressures were common and associated with increased mortality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,594,165
of 16,577,281 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#2,074
of 7,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,115
of 280,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#45
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,577,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.