You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deep coverage whole genome sequences and plasma lipoprotein(a) in individuals of European and African ancestries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-04668-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seyedeh M. Zekavat, Sanni Ruotsalainen, Robert E. Handsaker, Maris Alver, Jonathan Bloom, Timothy Poterba, Cotton Seed, Jason Ernst, Mark Chaffin, Jesse Engreitz, Gina M. Peloso, Ani Manichaikul, Chaojie Yang, Kathleen A. Ryan, Mao Fu, W. Craig Johnson, Michael Tsai, Matthew Budoff, Ramachandran S. Vasan, L. Adrienne Cupples, Jerome I. Rotter, Stephen S. Rich, Wendy Post, Braxton D. Mitchell, Adolfo Correa, Andres Metspalu, James G. Wilson, Veikko Salomaa, Manolis Kellis, Mark J. Daly, Benjamin M. Neale, Steven McCarroll, Ida Surakka, Tonu Esko, Andrea Ganna, Samuli Ripatti, Sekar Kathiresan, Pradeep Natarajan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| China | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 44% |
| Scientists | 25 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,214,192
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#18,808
of 58,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,410
of 345,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#470
of 1,259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.