↓ Skip to main content

Insights on the 2009 South Pacific tsunami in Samoa and Tonga from field surveys and numerical simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Earth-Science Reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insights on the 2009 South Pacific tsunami in Samoa and Tonga from field surveys and numerical simulations
Published in
Earth-Science Reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.03.004
Authors

Hermann M. Fritz, Jose C. Borrero, Costas E. Synolakis, Emile A. Okal, Robert Weiss, Vasily V. Titov, Bruce E. Jaffe, Spyros Foteinis, Patrick J. Lynett, I.-Chi Chan, Philip L.-F. Liu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 32%
Engineering 11 15%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,784,018
of 26,564,146 outputs
Outputs from Earth-Science Reviews
#746
of 1,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,719
of 129,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth-Science Reviews
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,564,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.