↓ Skip to main content

Minimal change disease associated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimal change disease associated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy: a case report
Published in
BMC Nephrology, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12882-018-0958-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bixia Gao, Ningjing Lin, Suxia Wang, Yu Wang

Abstract

Oncologic immunotherapy is a form of therapy intended to reactivate the immune response to tumor cells using agents that modulate immune checkpoints, such as programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. Along with activation of the immune system to tumors, immune-mediated kidney side effects have been reported, most of which are cases of interstitial nephritis. Glomerular disease, however, appears rare. Herein, we describe a patient with nephrotic syndrome related to treatment with an anti-PD1 antibody for Hodgkin lymphoma. Following the third dose of anti-PD1 antibody, the patient developed massive proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome. Kidney biopsy showed diffuse podocyte foot process effacement upon electron microscopy, which was consistent with minimal change disease. Corticosteroid treatment yielded full and rapid remission of nephrotic syndrome in 1 month. The present case suggests an association between anti-PD1 therapeutic immune activation and the development of nephrotic syndrome. Given the increasing prevalence of oncologic immunotherapy, patients should be routinely monitored for kidney side effects associated with these agents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Other 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,525,274
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#2,215
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,390
of 327,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#44
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.