↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary history of barley cultivation in Europe revealed by genetic analysis of extant landraces

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolutionary history of barley cultivation in Europe revealed by genetic analysis of extant landraces
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huw Jones, Peter Civáň, James Cockram, Fiona J Leigh, Lydia MJ Smith, Martin K Jones, Michael P Charles, José-Luis Molina-Cano, Wayne Powell, Glynis Jones, Terence A Brown

Abstract

Understanding the evolution of cultivated barley is important for two reasons. First, the evolutionary relationships between different landraces might provide information on the spread and subsequent development of barley cultivation, including the adaptation of the crop to new environments and its response to human selection. Second, evolutionary information would enable landraces with similar traits but different genetic backgrounds to be identified, providing alternative strategies for the introduction of these traits into modern germplasm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 3 3%
Czechia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 84 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Professor 5 6%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,055,552
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#803
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,349
of 153,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#19
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.