↓ Skip to main content

HapCHAT: adaptive haplotype assembly for efficiently leveraging high coverage in long reads

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HapCHAT: adaptive haplotype assembly for efficiently leveraging high coverage in long reads
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2253-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Beretta, Murray D. Patterson, Simone Zaccaria, Gianluca Della Vedova, Paola Bonizzoni

Abstract

Haplotype assembly is the process of assigning the different alleles of the variants covered by mapped sequencing reads to the two haplotypes of the genome of a human individual. Long reads, which are nowadays cheaper to produce and more widely available than ever before, have been used to reduce the fragmentation of the assembled haplotypes since their ability to span several variants along the genome. These long reads are also characterized by a high error rate, an issue which may be mitigated, however, with larger sets of reads, when this error rate is uniform across genome positions. Unfortunately, current state-of-the-art dynamic programming approaches designed for long reads deal only with limited coverages. Here, we propose a new method for assembling haplotypes which combines and extends the features of previous approaches to deal with long reads and higher coverages. In particular, our algorithm is able to dynamically adapt the estimated number of errors at each variant site, while minimizing the total number of error corrections necessary for finding a feasible solution. This allows our method to significantly reduce the required computational resources, allowing to consider datasets composed of higher coverages. The algorithm has been implemented in a freely available tool, HapCHAT: Haplotype Assembly Coverage Handling by Adapting Thresholds. An experimental analysis on sequencing reads with up to 60 × coverage reveals improvements in accuracy and recall achieved by considering a higher coverage with lower runtimes. Our method leverages the long-range information of sequencing reads that allows to obtain assembled haplotypes fragmented in a lower number of unphased haplotype blocks. At the same time, our method is also able to deal with higher coverages to better correct the errors in the original reads and to obtain more accurate haplotypes as a result. HapCHAT is available at http://hapchat.algolab.eu under the GNU Public License (GPL).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 45%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 26%
Computer Science 7 18%
Engineering 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,800,149
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#917
of 7,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,527
of 327,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#17
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.