↓ Skip to main content

A Guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
326 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
519 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheryl B Stetler, Laura J Damschroder, Christian D Helfrich, Hildi J Hagedorn

Abstract

Based on a critical synthesis of literature on use of the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework, revisions and a companion Guide were developed by a group of researchers independent of the original PARIHS team. The purpose of the Guide is to enhance and optimize efforts of researchers using PARIHS in implementation trials and evaluations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 519 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
United States 6 1%
Canada 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 491 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 104 20%
Student > Master 94 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 7%
Other 30 6%
Other 108 21%
Unknown 84 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 105 20%
Social Sciences 62 12%
Psychology 34 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 21 4%
Other 57 11%
Unknown 105 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,612,949
of 24,842,061 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#860
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,569
of 128,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,842,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.