↓ Skip to main content

Sleep and salivary cortisol in preterm neonates: a clinical, randomized, controlled, crossover study

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sleep and salivary cortisol in preterm neonates: a clinical, randomized, controlled, crossover study
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, January 2018
DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0546
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabrícia Magalhães Araújo, Mavilde da Luz Gonçalves Pedreira, Ariane Ferreira Machado Avelar, Márcia Lurdes de Cácia Pradella-Hallinan, Miriam Harumi Tsunemi, Eliana Moreira Pinheiro

Abstract

Analyze the influence of ear protectors on the baseline levels of salivary cortisol and response and total sleep time of preterm neonates during two periods of environmental management of a neonatal intermediate care unit. A clinical, randomized, controlled and crossover study conducted with 12 preterm neonates. The use of ear protectors was randomized in two periods. Sleep evaluation was performed using one Alice 5 Polysomnography System and unstructured observation. No significant difference was observed between the baseline levels of salivary cortisol and response in preterm neonates from the control and experimental groups, and no statistical significance was observed between the total sleep time of both groups. No relationship was observed between the baseline levels of cortisol and response and total sleep time. Ear protectors in preterm neonates did not influence the salivary cortisol level and total sleep time in the studied periods.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 24%
Researcher 4 19%
Lecturer 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#10,506,633
of 13,187,018 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#172
of 291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,835
of 267,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,187,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them