You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis methods for studying the 3D architecture of the genome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0745-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ferhat Ay, William S. Noble |
| Abstract |
The rapidly increasing quantity of genome-wide chromosome conformation capture data presents great opportunities and challenges in the computational modeling and interpretation of the three-dimensional genome. In particular, with recent trends towards higher-resolution high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) data, the diversity and complexity of biological hypotheses that can be tested necessitates rigorous computational and statistical methods as well as scalable pipelines to interpret these datasets. Here we review computational tools to interpret Hi-C data, including pipelines for mapping, filtering, and normalization, and methods for confidence estimation, domain calling, visualization, and three-dimensional modeling. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 29% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 13 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 516 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 480 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 144 | 28% |
| Researcher | 115 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 13% |
| Unknown | 74 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 170 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 167 | 32% |
| Computer Science | 46 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 13 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 6% |
| Unknown | 79 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,517,601
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,224
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,992
of 277,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#32
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.