↓ Skip to main content

Meta-representation of shape families

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta-representation of shape families
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2014
DOI 10.1145/2601097.2601185
Authors

Noa Fish, Melinos Averkiou, Oliver van Kaick, Olga Sorkine-Hornung, Daniel Cohen-Or, Niloy J. Mitra

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 4%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 92 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 39%
Student > Master 20 19%
Researcher 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 73 70%
Engineering 9 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Design 2 2%
Neuroscience 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 15 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,607,918
of 16,822,220 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#317
of 2,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,029
of 242,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#12
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,822,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.