↓ Skip to main content

On Critiques of “Stationarity is Dead: Whither Water Management?”

Overview of attention for article published in Water Resources Research, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On Critiques of “Stationarity is Dead: Whither Water Management?”
Published in
Water Resources Research, September 2015
DOI 10.1002/2015wr017408
Authors

P. C. D. Milly, Julio Betancourt, Malin Falkenmark, Robert M. Hirsch, Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz, Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Ronald J. Stouffer, Michael D. Dettinger, Valentina Krysanova

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
China 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 178 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 25%
Researcher 46 24%
Student > Master 39 21%
Professor 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 14 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 47 25%
Environmental Science 46 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 37 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 33 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,021,651
of 15,680,047 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#189
of 3,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,203
of 241,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#8
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,680,047 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.