↓ Skip to main content

The association between residential area characteristics and mental health outcomes among men and women in Belgium

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Public Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The association between residential area characteristics and mental health outcomes among men and women in Belgium
Published in
Archives of Public Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/0778-7367-69-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elise Pattyn, Lore Van Praag, Mieke Verhaeghe, Katia Levecque, Piet Bracke

Abstract

Recently, interest has grown in the association between contextual factors and health outcomes. This study questions whether mental health complaints vary according to the socio-economic characteristics of the residential area where people live. The gender-specific patterns are studied. Complaints of depression and generalized anxiety were measured by means of the relevant subscales of the Symptoms Checklist 90-Revised. Multilevel models were estimated with PASW statistics 18, based on a unique dataset, constructed by merging data from the Belgian Health Interview Surveys from 2001 and 2004 with data from 264 municipalities derived from Statistics Belgium and the General Socio-Economic Survey. The results of this exploratory study indicate that the local unemployment rate is associated with complaints of depression among women. This study suggests that policy should approach the male and female population differently when implementing mental health prevention campaigns.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Iceland 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Psychology 3 11%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,369,982
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#291
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,242
of 152,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them