↓ Skip to main content

Floral development of Hydrocera and Impatiens reveals evolutionary trends in the most early diverged lineages of the Balsaminaceae

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Botany, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Floral development of Hydrocera and Impatiens reveals evolutionary trends in the most early diverged lineages of the Balsaminaceae
Published in
Annals of Botany, April 2012
DOI 10.1093/aob/mcs065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven B. Janssens, Erik F. Smets, Alexander Vrijdaghs

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 7%
Brazil 1 7%
Belgium 1 7%
Unknown 12 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 67%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Other 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,425,907
of 12,023,427 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#1,385
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,144
of 239,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#46
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,023,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.