You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Folic acid supplementation before and during pregnancy in the Newborn Epigenetics STudy (NEST)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-46 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cathrine Hoyo, Amy P Murtha, Joellen M Schildkraut, Michele R Forman, Brian Calingaert, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Joanne Kurtzberg, Randy L Jirtle, Susan K Murphy |
Abstract |
Folic acid (FA) added to foods during fortification is 70-85% bioavailable compared to 50% of folate occurring naturally in foods. Thus, if FA supplements also are taken during pregnancy, both mother and fetus can be exposed to FA exceeding the Institute of Medicine's recommended tolerable upper limit (TUL) of 1,000 micrograms per day (μg/d) for adult pregnant women. The primary objective is to estimate the proportion of women taking folic acid (FA) doses exceeding the TUL before and during pregnancy, and to identify correlates of high FA use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 150 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 16% |
Unknown | 29 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Other | 23 | 15% |
Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,354,167
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,706
of 14,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,477
of 182,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#18
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.