↓ Skip to main content

HiCdat: a fast and easy-to-use Hi-C data analysis tool

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HiCdat: a fast and easy-to-use Hi-C data analysis tool
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0678-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc W. Schmid, Stefan Grob, Ueli Grossniklaus

Abstract

The study of nuclear architecture using Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) technologies is a novel frontier in biology. With further reduction in sequencing costs, the potential of Hi-C in describing nuclear architecture as a phenotype is only about to unfold. To use Hi-C for phenotypic comparisons among different cell types, conditions, or genetic backgrounds, Hi-C data processing needs to be more accessible to biologists. HiCdat provides a simple graphical user interface for data pre-processing and a collection of higher-level data analysis tools implemented in R. Data pre-processing also supports a wide range of additional data types required for in-depth analysis of the Hi-C data (e.g. RNA-Seq, ChIP-Seq, and BS-Seq). HiCdat is easy-to-use and provides solutions starting from aligned reads up to in-depth analyses. Importantly, HiCdat is focussed on the analysis of larger structural features of chromosomes, their correlation to genomic and epigenomic features, and on comparative studies. It uses simple input and output formats and can therefore easily be integrated into existing workflows or combined with alternative tools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 123 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 28%
Researcher 28 21%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Professor 7 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 32%
Computer Science 18 14%
Engineering 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 17 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,345,593
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,375
of 7,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,610
of 266,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#87
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.