You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: the impact of funding by the UK's 'Arthritis Research Campaign'
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, July 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-2-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen R Hanney, Jonathan Grant, Steven Wooding, Martin J Buxton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 14% |
| Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 45 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,425,370
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1,161
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,537
of 53,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.