↓ Skip to main content

Medidas aerodinâmicas, eletroglotográficas e acústicas na produção da fricativa pós-alveolar vozeada

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 156)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medidas aerodinâmicas, eletroglotográficas e acústicas na produção da fricativa pós-alveolar vozeada
Published in
CoDAS, June 2018
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20182017177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrícia Tiemi Hashimoto, Luciana de Oliveira Pagan-Neves, Luis Miguel Teixeira de Jesus, Haydée Fiszbein Wertzner

Abstract

Describe and correlate phonological and complementary measures regarding aerodynamics, electroglottography, acoustics, and perceptual judgment of production of the voiced fricative sound /ʒ/ comparing the performance of Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children with and without speech sound disorders. Study participants were 30 children aged 5 years to 7 years and 11 months divided into a group of children with typical development - Control Group (CG) and a group of children with speech sound disorders - Research Group (RG). Phonology (PCC, PCC-R, and occurrence of phonological processes) and the aerodynamic (amplitude of the oral airflow and f0), eletroglottographic (open quotient) and acoustic (classification of voicing) measures were evaluated. Numerically, children with speech sound disorders presented higher relative oral airflow amplitude, lower relative f0, and open quotient indicative of less efficient voicing production compared with those of children with typical development. The weak voicing values ​​showed that 66.1% of the children with speech sound disorders presented weaker voicing of the fricative sound /ʒ/ compared with that of the posterior vowel sound, and between-groups comparison demonstrated that these children presented greater difficulty in voicing. The acoustic analysis of speech used to classify the weak/strong voicing showed variations, especially regarding the classification partially devoiced. Results suggest that the strategies for voicing production and voicing maintenance of the fricative sound /ʒ/ are still variable in children aged 5 years to 7 years and 11 months; however, children with speech sound disorders seem to have more difficulties in using them effectively. In addition, the study shows the importance of applying complementary tests to obtain a more detailed diagnosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Linguistics 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 4 31%
Unknown 3 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,273,831
of 13,199,565 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#45
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,130
of 267,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,199,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.