↓ Skip to main content

Physically-based in silico light sheet microscopy for visualizing fluorescent brain models

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physically-based in silico light sheet microscopy for visualizing fluorescent brain models
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-16-s11-s8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marwan Abdellah, Ahmet Bilgili, Stefan Eilemann, Henry Markram, Felix Schürmann

Abstract

We present a physically-based computational model of the light sheet fluorescence microscope (LSFM). Based on Monte Carlo ray tracing and geometric optics, our method simulates the operational aspects and image formation process of the LSFM. This simulated, in silico LSFM creates synthetic images of digital fluorescent specimens that can resemble those generated by a real LSFM, as opposed to established visualization methods producing visually-plausible images. We also propose an accurate fluorescence rendering model which takes into account the intrinsic characteristics of fluorescent dyes to simulate the light interaction with fluorescent biological specimen. We demonstrate first results of our visualization pipeline to a simplified brain tissue model reconstructed from the somatosensory cortex of a young rat. The modeling aspects of the LSFM units are qualitatively analysed, and the results of the fluorescence model were quantitatively validated against the fluorescence brightness equation and characteristic emission spectra of different fluorescent dyes. Modelling and simulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
France 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Other 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 22%
Physics and Astronomy 8 18%
Neuroscience 6 13%
Computer Science 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,446,606
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,197
of 7,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,452
of 264,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#60
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.