↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

A 48 SNP set for grapevine cultivar identification

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A 48 SNP set for grapevine cultivar identification
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-11-153
Pubmed ID
22060012
Authors

José A Cabezas, Javier Ibáñez, Diego Lijavetzky, Dolores Vélez, Gema Bravo, Virginia Rodríguez, Iván Carreño, Angelica M Jermakow, Juan Carreño, Leonor Ruiz-García, Mark R Thomas, José M Martinez-Zapater

Abstract

Rapid and consistent genotyping is an important requirement for cultivar identification in many crop species. Among them grapevine cultivars have been the subject of multiple studies given the large number of synonyms and homonyms generated during many centuries of vegetative multiplication and exchange. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers have been preferred until now because of their high level of polymorphism, their codominant nature and their high profile repeatability. However, the rapid application of partial or complete genome sequencing approaches is identifying thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) that can be very useful for such purposes. Although SNP markers are bi-allelic, and therefore not as polymorphic as microsatellites, the high number of loci that can be multiplexed and the possibilities of automation as well as their highly repeatable results under any analytical procedure make them the future markers of choice for any type of genetic identification.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 148 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 20%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 19 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 13%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 22 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2011.
All research outputs
#2,327,740
of 4,505,992 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#314
of 776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,584
of 74,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 776 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.