↓ Skip to main content

Report from the second cytomegalovirus and immunosenescence workshop

Overview of attention for article published in Immunity & Ageing, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Report from the second cytomegalovirus and immunosenescence workshop
Published in
Immunity & Ageing, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1742-4933-8-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Wills, Arne Akbar, Mark Beswick, Jos A Bosch, Calogero Caruso, Giuseppina Colonna-Romano, Ambarish Dutta, Claudio Franceschi, Tamas Fulop, Effrossyni Gkrania-Klotsas, Joerg Goronzy, Stephen J Griffiths, Sian M Henson, Dietmar Herndler-Brandstetter, Ann Hill, Florian Kern, Paul Klenerman, Derek Macallan, Richard Macaulay, Andrea B Maier, Gavin Mason, David Melzer, Matthew Morgan, Paul Moss, Janko Nikolich-Zugich, Annette Pachnio, Natalie Riddell, Ryan Roberts, Paolo Sansoni, Delphine Sauce, John Sinclair, Rafael Solana, Jan Strindhall, Piotr Trzonkowski, Rene van Lier, Rosanna Vescovini, George Wang, Rudi Westendorp, Graham Pawelec

Abstract

The Second International Workshop on CMV & Immunosenescence was held in Cambridge, UK, 2-4th December, 2010. The presentations covered four separate sessions: cytomegalovirus and T cell phenotypes; T cell memory frequency, inflation and immunosenescence; cytomegalovirus in aging, mortality and disease states; and the immunobiology of cytomegalovirus-specific T cells and effects of the virus on vaccination. This commentary summarizes the major findings of these presentations and references subsequently published work from the presenter laboratory where appropriate and draws together major themes that were subsequently discussed along with new areas of interest that were highlighted by this discussion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
France 2 4%
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 11 22%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,767,805
of 23,419,482 outputs
Outputs from Immunity & Ageing
#250
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,575
of 142,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunity & Ageing
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,419,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them