↓ Skip to main content

Quality of Surface Water in Missouri, Water Year 2016

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of Surface Water in Missouri, Water Year 2016
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2018
DOI 10.3133/ds1086
Authors

Barr, Miya N., Bartels, Katherine Ann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#10,551,315
of 13,248,851 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,277
of 1,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,983
of 266,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#78
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,248,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.