↓ Skip to main content

Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in this source, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
409 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007228.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inglis, Sally C, Clark, Robyn A, McAlister, Finlay A, Ball, Jocasta, Lewinter, Christian, Cullington, Damien, Stewart, Simon, Cleland, John GF

Abstract

Specialised disease management programmes for chronic heart failure (CHF) improve survival, quality of life and reduce healthcare utilisation. The overall efficacy of structured telephone support or telemonitoring as an individual component of a CHF disease management strategy remains inconclusive.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 33%
Student > Master 11 26%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 17%
Computer Science 5 12%
Arts and Humanities 4 10%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Other 11 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#518,651
of 10,246,101 outputs
Outputs from this source
#1,970
of 9,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,978
of 99,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#18
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,246,101 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.