You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The relation between celiac disease, nonceliac gluten sensitivity and irritable bowel syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-015-0080-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdy El-Salhy, Jan Gunnar Hatlebakk, Odd Helge Gilja, Trygve Hausken |
| Abstract |
Wheat products make a substantial contribution to the dietary intake of many people worldwide. Despite the many beneficial aspects of consuming wheat products, it is also responsible for several diseases such as celiac disease (CD), wheat allergy, and nonceliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). CD and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients have similar gastrointestinal symptoms, which can result in CD patients being misdiagnosed as having IBS. Therefore, CD should be excluded in IBS patients. A considerable proportion of CD patients suffer from IBS symptoms despite adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD). The inflammation caused by gluten intake may not completely subside in some CD patients. It is not clear that gluten triggers the symptoms in NCGS, but there is compelling evidence that carbohydrates (fructans and galactans) in wheat does. It is likely that NCGS patients are a group of self-diagnosed IBS patients who self-treat by adhering to a GFD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Ireland | 2 | 10% |
| Hungary | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Russia | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 225 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,012,611
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#290
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,675
of 279,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.