↓ Skip to main content

Limited nitrate retention capacity in the Upper Mississippi River

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Limited nitrate retention capacity in the Upper Mississippi River
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), July 2018
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aacd51
Authors

Luke C Loken, John T Crawford, Mark M Dornblaser, Robert G Striegl, Jeffrey N Houser, Peter A Turner, Emily H Stanley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 25%
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,005,654
of 19,033,718 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1,288
of 4,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,844
of 287,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#64
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,033,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.