You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Limited nitrate retention capacity in the Upper Mississippi River
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/aacd51 |
| Authors |
Luke C Loken, John T Crawford, Mark M Dornblaser, Robert G Striegl, Jeffrey N Houser, Peter A Turner, Emily H Stanley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 52% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 48% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Researcher | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,804,177
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#2,114
of 6,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,721
of 339,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#64
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.