You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Correction to: Huddling remodels gut microbiota to reduce energy requirements in a small mammal species during cold exposure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Microbiome, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40168-018-0509-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xue-Ying Zhang, Gansukh Sukhchuluun, Ting-Bei Bo, Qing-Sheng Chi, Jun-Jie Yang, Bin Chen, Lei Zhang, De-Hua Wang |
Abstract |
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the caption of Fig. 4. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 43% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,419,368
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,390
of 1,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,421
of 326,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#51
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.