↓ Skip to main content

Step-up fecal microbiota transplantation strategy: a pilot study for steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Step-up fecal microbiota transplantation strategy: a pilot study for steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0646-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bota Cui, Pan Li, Lijuan Xu, Youquan Zhao, Huiquan Wang, Zhaoyuan Peng, Hai’e Xu, Jie Xiang, Zhi He, Ting Zhang, Yongzhan Nie, Kaichun Wu, Daiming Fan, Guozhong Ji, Faming Zhang

Abstract

The strategy of using fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) remains unclear if single FMT failed to induce remission. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a designed step-up FMT strategy for the steroid-dependent UC. Fifteen patients with steroid-dependent UC were enrolled, and treated with step-up FMT strategy. Follow-up clinical data was collected for a minimum of 3 months. Fecal microbiota composition before and post FMT of patients and related donors were analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Eight of fourteen (57.1 %) patients achieved clinical improvement and were able to discontinue steroids following step-up FMT. One patient was lost to follow-up. Among the 8 patients who responded, five (35.7 %) received one FMT therapy, one (7.1 %) received two FMTs, and two (14.2 %) received two FMTs plus a scheduled course of steroids. Four (28.6 %) of the 8 patients who responded maintained long-term remission during follow-up (3-18 months). Six patients (42.9 %) failed to meet the criteria of clinical improvement and maintained steroid dependence, though three experienced transient or partial improvement. Microbiota analysis showed that FMT altered the composition greatly, and a microbiota composition highly similar to that of the donor emerged in the patients with successful treatment. No severe adverse events occurred during treatment and follow-up. Step-up FMT strategy shows promise as a therapeutic strategy for patients with steroid-dependent UC, likely due to the successful restructuring of gut microbial composition. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number NCT01790061.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 160 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 37 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,222,780
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,157
of 3,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,576
of 267,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#24
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.