You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Narrowing the “digital divide”—facilitating access to computer technology to enhance the lives of those with aphasia: a feasibility study
Aphasiology, August 2015
Helen Kelly, Fiona Kennedy, Hannah Britton, Graham McGuire, James Law
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||50%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||17||15%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||16||14%|
|Student > Bachelor||15||13%|
|Student > Postgraduate||6||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||16||14%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||11||10%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Aphasiology
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 266,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aphasiology
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.