↓ Skip to main content

Newly identified RNAs of raspberry leaf blotch virus encoding a related group of proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Virology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Newly identified RNAs of raspberry leaf blotch virus encoding a related group of proteins
Published in
Journal of General Virology, November 2015
DOI 10.1099/jgv.0.000277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuwen Lu, Wendy McGavin, Peter J. A. Cock, Esther Schnettler, Fei Yan, Jianping Chen, Stuart MacFarlane

Abstract

Emaraviruses, including Raspberry leaf blotch virus (RLBV), are enveloped plant viruses with segmented genomes of negative-strand RNA, although, what is the complete genome complement for any of these viruses is not yet clear. Currently, Wheat mosaic virus has the largest emaravirus genome comprising eight RNAs. Previously we identified five genomic RNAs for RLBV, however, here we identify a further three RNAs (RNA6, RNA7, RNA8). The RNAs 6, 7 and 8 encode proteins that have clear homologies to one another but not to any other emaravirus proteins. The proteins self-interacted in yeast two hybrid and bimolecular fluorescence complementation experiments, and the P8 protein interacted with the virus nucleocapsid protein (P3) using BiFC. Expression of two of the proteins (P6 and P7) using Potato virus X led to an increase in virus titre and symptom severity, suggesting that these proteins may play a role in RLBV pathogenicity, however, using two different tests RNA silencing suppression activity was not detected for any of the RLBV proteins encoded by RNAs 2 to 8.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Other 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#10,197,566
of 13,365,077 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Virology
#4,684
of 5,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,119
of 240,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Virology
#46
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,365,077 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,282 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.