You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Newly identified RNAs of raspberry leaf blotch virus encoding a related group of proteins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Virology, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1099/jgv.0.000277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuwen Lu, Wendy McGavin, Peter J A Cock, Esther Schnettler, Fei Yan, Jianping Chen, Stuart MacFarlane |
| Abstract |
Emaraviruses, including Raspberry leaf blotch virus (RLBV), are enveloped plant viruses with segmented genomes of negative-strand RNA, although, what is the complete genome complement for any of these viruses is not yet clear. Currently, Wheat mosaic virus has the largest emaravirus genome comprising eight RNAs. Previously we identified five genomic RNAs for RLBV, however, here we identify a further three RNAs (RNA6, RNA7, RNA8). The RNAs 6, 7 and 8 encode proteins that have clear homologies to one another but not to any other emaravirus proteins. The proteins self-interacted in yeast two hybrid and bimolecular fluorescence complementation experiments, and the P8 protein interacted with the virus nucleocapsid protein (P3) using BiFC. Expression of two of the proteins (P6 and P7) using Potato virus X led to an increase in virus titre and symptom severity, suggesting that these proteins may play a role in RLBV pathogenicity, however, using two different tests RNA silencing suppression activity was not detected for any of the RLBV proteins encoded by RNAs 2 to 8. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#19,947,956
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Virology
#5,919
of 6,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,662
of 279,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Virology
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.