↓ Skip to main content

Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001757.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven R Brown, Himanshu Wadhawan, Richard L Nelson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Unknown 167 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 12 7%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Psychology 8 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 36 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,637,724
of 15,348,605 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,417
of 11,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,265
of 242,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#206
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,348,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.