↓ Skip to main content

Effective automated pipeline for 3D reconstruction of synapses based on deep learning

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective automated pipeline for 3D reconstruction of synapses based on deep learning
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12859-018-2232-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chi Xiao, Weifu Li, Hao Deng, Xi Chen, Yang Yang, Qiwei Xie, Hua Han

Abstract

The locations and shapes of synapses are important in reconstructing connectomes and analyzing synaptic plasticity. However, current synapse detection and segmentation methods are still not adequate for accurately acquiring the synaptic connectivity, and they cannot effectively alleviate the burden of synapse validation. We propose a fully automated method that relies on deep learning to realize the 3D reconstruction of synapses in electron microscopy (EM) images. The proposed method consists of three main parts: (1) training and employing the faster region convolutional neural networks (R-CNN) algorithm to detect synapses, (2) using the z-continuity of synapses to reduce false positives, and (3) combining the Dijkstra algorithm with the GrabCut algorithm to obtain the segmentation of synaptic clefts. Experimental results were validated by manual tracking, and the effectiveness of our proposed method was demonstrated. The experimental results in anisotropic and isotropic EM volumes demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm, and the average precision of our detection (92.8% in anisotropy, 93.5% in isotropy) and segmentation (88.6% in anisotropy, 93.0% in isotropy) suggests that our method achieves state-of-the-art results. Our fully automated approach contributes to the development of neuroscience, providing neurologists with a rapid approach for obtaining rich synaptic statistics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 19%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Professor 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 12%
Engineering 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 19 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,365
of 7,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,403
of 327,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#84
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.