↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of Self-Reported Hypertension in Deaf Adults Who Use American Sign Language

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Hypertension, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of Self-Reported Hypertension in Deaf Adults Who Use American Sign Language
Published in
American Journal of Hypertension, July 2018
DOI 10.1093/ajh/hpy111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abbi N Simons, Christopher J Moreland, Poorna Kushalnagar

Abstract

In the U.S., roughly one-third of adults have hypertension; another third have prehypertension. The prevalence of hypertension in deaf American Sign Language (ASL) users is unknown. We address this gap through a descriptive study for the prevalence of hypertension in the American Deaf community, and discuss future directions to address this issue. Self-reported data for 1388 ASL-using deaf adults were compared to a secondary data of 2830 English-speaking hearing adults. Frequency and percentages were used to describe the prevalence of hypertension in the deaf community. Age-weighted analysis was used to compare unmodifiable risk factors and hypertension rate between deaf and hearing adults. Deaf and hearing samples' hypertension rates for gender and age were similar. Significant group differences between deaf and hearing samples emerged across race. Compared to the hearing controls, our deaf sample demonstrated a significantly decreased risk for hypertension with a prevalence of 37% (compared to 45% in the hearing sample). Although the hypertension rate for gender and age was similar across deaf and hearing samples, between-group disparities exist for race. The lower rate of hypertension in our deaf sample is likely a consequence of underdiagnoses due to lower health literacy and poor patient-physician communication. Furthermore, deaf Black Americans' lower rates compared to hearing Black Americans may be due to poor patient-physician communication, not having regular providers, or social stressors. It is recommended that modifiable risk factors and social determinants be investigated to determine their effect on hypertension within the deaf community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 25 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 28 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,012,681
of 23,758,334 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Hypertension
#508
of 2,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,852
of 328,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Hypertension
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,758,334 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.