↓ Skip to main content

Is the track of the Yellowstone hotspot driven by a deep mantle plume? — Review of volcanism, faulting, and uplift in light of new data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the track of the Yellowstone hotspot driven by a deep mantle plume? — Review of volcanism, faulting, and uplift in light of new data
Published in
Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research, November 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.07.009
Authors

Kenneth L. Pierce, Lisa A. Morgan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
France 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 169 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 20%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Professor 12 7%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 15 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 140 78%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Linguistics 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 21 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2015.
All research outputs
#1,276,300
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research
#95
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,707
of 247,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.