↓ Skip to main content

A stochastic model of randomly accelerated walkers for human mobility

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A stochastic model of randomly accelerated walkers for human mobility
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms12600
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riccardo Gallotti, Armando Bazzani, Sandro Rambaldi, Marc Barthelemy

Abstract

Recent studies of human mobility largely focus on displacements patterns and power law fits of empirical long-tailed distributions of distances are usually associated to scale-free superdiffusive random walks called Lévy flights. However, drawing conclusions about a complex system from a fit, without any further knowledge of the underlying dynamics, might lead to erroneous interpretations. Here we show, on the basis of a data set describing the trajectories of 780,000 private vehicles in Italy, that the Lévy flight model cannot explain the behaviour of travel times and speeds. We therefore introduce a class of accelerated random walks, validated by empirical observations, where the velocity changes due to acceleration kicks at random times. Combining this mechanism with an exponentially decaying distribution of travel times leads to a short-tailed distribution of distances which could indeed be mistaken with a truncated power law. These results illustrate the limits of purely descriptive models and provide a mechanistic view of mobility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 116 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 21%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 20 17%
Engineering 16 13%
Physics and Astronomy 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Mathematics 4 3%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 43 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,435,238
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#28,634
of 55,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,791
of 345,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#439
of 866 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 866 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.