↓ Skip to main content

Towards health equity: a framework for the application of proportionate universalism

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 2,263)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
41 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards health equity: a framework for the application of proportionate universalism
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12939-015-0207-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gemma Carey, Brad Crammond, Evelyne De Leeuw

Abstract

The finding that there is a social gradient in health has prompted considerable interest in public health circles. Recent influential works describing health inequities and their causes do not always argue cogently for a policy framework that would drive the most appropriate solutions differentially across the social gradient This paper aims to develop a practice heuristic for proportionate universalism. Through a review the proposed heuristic integrates evidence from welfare state and policy research, the literature on universal and targeted policy frameworks, and a multi-level governance approach that adopts the principle of subsidiarity. The proposed heuristic provides a more-grained analysis of different policy approaches, integral for operationalizing the concept of proportionate universalism. The proposed framework would allow governments at all levels, social policy developers and bureaucrats, public health professionals and activists to consider the appropriateness of distinctive policy objectives across distinctive population needs within universal welfare state principles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 315 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 16%
Researcher 43 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Other 56 18%
Unknown 89 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 21%
Social Sciences 53 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 101 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#501,466
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#41
of 2,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,609
of 282,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.