↓ Skip to main content

Airway management in simulated restricted access to a patient - can manikin-based studies provide relevant data?

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Airway management in simulated restricted access to a patient - can manikin-based studies provide relevant data?
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1757-7241-19-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anders R Nakstad, Mårten Sandberg

Abstract

Alternatives to endotracheal intubation (ETI) are required when access to the cranial end of the patient is restricted. In this study, the success rate and time duration of standard intubation techniques were compared with two different supraglottic devices. Two different manikins were used for the study, and the training effect was studied when the same manikin was repeatedly used.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 6%
South Africa 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 69%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2011.
All research outputs
#2,018,139
of 3,635,018 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#187
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,628
of 70,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,635,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.