You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of anxiety disorders in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008483.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zafar A Usmani, Kristin V Carson, Jien N Cheng, Adrian J Esterman, Brian J Smith |
| Abstract |
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterised by inflammation of the airways and destruction of pulmonary tissue with post bronchodilator FEV1/FVC of <0.70 (forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity). Evidence indicates an increased prevalence of anxiety disorders in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), as compared with the general population and persons suffering from many other chronic illnesses. Anxiety in people with COPD has been shown to increase disability and impair functional status, resulting in an overall reduction in quality of life. As such, pharmacological interventions are commonly used to treat anxiety disorders in patients with COPD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 215 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 66 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 34% |
| Psychology | 20 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 72 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,723,600
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,373
of 155,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.