You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Randomized Trial of a Low-Literacy Chronic Pain Self-Management Program: Analysis of Secondary Pain and Psychological Outcome Measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.06.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara J Turner, Yuanyuan Liang, Natalia Rodriguez, Raudel Bobadilla, Maureen J Simmonds, Zenong Yin |
| Abstract |
Based on input of rural, largely Hispanic persons with chronic pain, a low literacy, 6-month self-management program was developed drawing upon elements of existing pain toolkits. In a randomized trial, low-income, primarily Hispanic patients with chronic pain received the program in 6 one-on-one meetings with a trained health educator in clinic or in 8 group lectures by experts in the community. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses in linear mixed effects models were conducted for five secondary outcomes at 6-months including: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity and interference, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), 12-Item Short Form Survey Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11). 111 participants were randomized (15.9% of 700 initially eligible from 3 clinics) and 67 (60.4%) completed 6-month measures. Among completers, the clinic arm improved on 4 measures and community arm on 3 (all P<0.05). Effect sizes were small to moderate (0.41 to 0.52). In ITT analyses, both arms improved on 4 of 5 measures (all Pā¤0.001) versus baseline with clinically significant changes in BPI pain severity and interference. Improvement in multiple outcomes after this chronic pain self-management program for low income patients warrants further study. This intervention was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov and can be found using identifier NCT02906358. In an evaluation of a low literacy, 6-month chronic pain self-management program, similar improvements were observed among primarily Hispanic participants whether the intervention was delivered by a health educator or in groups with lectures from experts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 14% |
| Psychology | 11 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 59 | 50% |