↓ Skip to main content

Twitter-Based Journal Clubs: Additional Facts and Clarifications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Internet Research, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
40 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Twitter-Based Journal Clubs: Additional Facts and Clarifications
Published in
Journal of Medical Internet Research, January 2015
DOI 10.2196/jmir.4639
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joel M Topf, Topf, Joel M, Sparks, Matthew A, Iannuzzella, Francesco, Lerma, Edgar, Oates, Thomas, Phelan, Paul J, Hiremath, Swapnil, Matthew A Sparks, Francesco Iannuzzella, Edgar Lerma, Thomas Oates, Paul J Phelan, Swapnil Hiremath

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 5%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Unspecified 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Unspecified 4 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Computer Science 2 10%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2017.
All research outputs
#407,071
of 12,210,645 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#419
of 2,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,128
of 223,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#16
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,210,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.