↓ Skip to main content

Do economic values and expenditures for viewing waterfowl in the U.S. differ among species?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do economic values and expenditures for viewing waterfowl in the U.S. differ among species?
Published in
Human Dimensions of Wildlife, July 2018
DOI 10.1080/10871209.2018.1496371
Authors

John Loomis, Michelle Haefele, James Dubovsky, Aaron M. Lien, Wayne E. Thogmartin, James Diffendorfer, Dale Humburg, Brady J. Mattsson, Kenneth Bagstad, Darius Semmens, Laura Lopez-Hoffman, Robert Merideth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 26%
Environmental Science 3 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,825,804
of 14,498,896 outputs
Outputs from Human Dimensions of Wildlife
#130
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,855
of 273,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Dimensions of Wildlife
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,498,896 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.