You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structuring Feedback and Debriefing to Achieve Mastery Learning Goals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Academic medicine, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1097/acm.0000000000000934 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter J. Eppich, Elizabeth A. Hunt, Jordan M. Duval-Arnould, Viva Jo Siddall, Adam Cheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 20% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 304 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 11% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 90 | 29% |
| Unknown | 59 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 6% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 74 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,444,380
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Academic medicine
#1,323
of 6,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,583
of 295,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic medicine
#20
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.