↓ Skip to main content

Structuring Feedback and Debriefing to Achieve Mastery Learning Goals

Overview of attention for article published in Academic medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
Title
Structuring Feedback and Debriefing to Achieve Mastery Learning Goals
Published in
Academic medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1097/acm.0000000000000934
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter J. Eppich, Elizabeth A. Hunt, Jordan M. Duval-Arnould, Viva Jo Siddall, Adam Cheng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 304 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Other 31 10%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Other 89 29%
Unknown 59 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 15%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Psychology 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 74 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,444,380
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Academic medicine
#1,323
of 6,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,583
of 295,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic medicine
#20
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.