| Title |
How to Combat the Opioid Epidemic, 1 Nudge at a Time
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Surgery, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2084 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David D. Q. Zhang, Fahima Dossa, Nancy N. Baxter |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 31% |
| Canada | 6 | 21% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 34% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 22% |
| Psychology | 2 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Design | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#851,750
of 24,471,305 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#876
of 3,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,250
of 355,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#29
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,471,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.