↓ Skip to main content

Field and laboratory guide to freshwater cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms for Native American and Alaska Native communities

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 456)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field and laboratory guide to freshwater cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms for Native American and Alaska Native communities
Published in
US Geological Survey, September 2015
DOI 10.3133/ofr20151164
Authors

Barry H. Rosen, Ann St. Amand, Rosen, Barry H., Ann St. Amand, , St. Amand, Ann, Ann St. Amand

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#476,911
of 7,866,711 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#39
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,520
of 233,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,866,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them