↓ Skip to main content

Discovery and validation of autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discovery and validation of autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease mutations
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13195-018-0392-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Hsu, Brian A. Gordon, Russ Hornbeck, Joanne B. Norton, Denise Levitch, Adia Louden, Ellen Ziegemeier, Robert Laforce, Jasmeer Chhatwal, Gregory S. Day, Eric McDade, John C. Morris, Anne M. Fagan, Tammie L. S. Benzinger, Alison M. Goate, Carlos Cruchaga, Randall J. Bateman, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN), Celeste M. Karch

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease that is clinically characterized by progressive cognitive decline. Mutations in amyloid-β precursor protein (APP), presenilin 1 (PSEN1), and presenilin 2 (PSEN2) are the pathogenic cause of autosomal dominant AD (ADAD). However, polymorphisms also exist within these genes. In order to distinguish polymorphisms from pathogenic mutations, the DIAN Expanded Registry has implemented an algorithm for determining ADAD pathogenicity using available information from multiple domains, including genetic, bioinformatic, clinical, imaging, and biofluid measures and in vitro analyses. We propose that PSEN1 M84V, PSEN1 A396T, PSEN2 R284G, and APP T719N are likely pathogenic mutations, whereas PSEN1 c.379_382delXXXXinsG and PSEN2 L238F have uncertain pathogenicity. In defining a subset of these variants as pathogenic, individuals from these families can now be enrolled in observational and clinical trials. This study outlines a critical approach for translating genetic data into meaningful clinical outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 23 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Neuroscience 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,382,316
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#537
of 1,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,836
of 329,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#27
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.