↓ Skip to main content

Engaging rural women in healthy lifestyle programs: insights from a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engaging rural women in healthy lifestyle programs: insights from a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0860-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha L. Kozica, Cheryce L. Harrison, Helena J. Teede, Sze Ng, Lisa J. Moran, Catherine B. Lombard

Abstract

The obesity epidemic is well established, particularly in rural settings. Programs promoting healthy lifestyles for rural women are urgently needed; however, participant engagement is challenging. In the context of a large randomized controlled trial targeting the prevention of weight gain in rural women, we explored successful recruitment strategies and aimed to understand participants' barriers, enablers and reasons for program participation. We recruited women (aged 18-55 years) from the general rural Australian population. A mixed-methods approach was applied to explore factors that influenced program participation, including quantitative questionnaires for all participants (n = 649) and qualitative semi-structured interviews conducted for a subgroup of participants (n = 45). Data were collected at three time points: baseline, 6 and 12 months post program commencement. We recruited 649 rural women through a community communication and partnering strategy, a program marketing campaign and mobilization of social networks. Program participants were diverse across education and income levels and were representative of the wider Australian regional population. Factors that influenced program engagement were divided into personal (perceived program benefits and program accessibility) and social (peer persuasion and support). Identified enablers included convenience of the program location, perceived program utility, such as weight management and optimization of lifestyle choices, as well as attending the program with peer support. Barriers to engagement, which are likely exacerbated in rural communities included lack of anonymity, self-consciousness and segregated social networks in rural settings. Participants reported that eliciting local support and maximizing publicity is fundamental to improving future program engagement. Multiple program promotion strategies including communication, marketing and partnering, as well as mobilization of social networks and peer persuasion, enabled engagement of rural women into a healthy lifestyle program. These recruitment strategies are consistent with successful strategies utilized previously to recruit urban-dwelling women into lifestyle programs. Future engagement efforts in rural settings could be enhanced by hosting multiple sessions within existing socio-cultural networks and assuring participants that they will not need to share their personal health information with others in their community. Australia & New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry. Trial number ACTRN12612000115831 . Date of registration 24 January 2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 61 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 17%
Social Sciences 19 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Psychology 17 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 72 39%