↓ Skip to main content

Identifying cost-effective invasive species control to enhance endangered species populations in the Grand Canyon, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Identifying cost-effective invasive species control to enhance endangered species populations in the Grand Canyon, USA
Published in
Biological Conservation, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.032
Authors

Lucas S. Bair, Charles B. Yackulic, Michael R. Springborn, Matthew N. Reimer, Craig A. Bond, Lewis G. Coggins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 26%
Unspecified 5 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 26%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 16%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,030,362
of 13,355,879 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#905
of 3,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,016
of 267,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#30
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,355,879 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.