↓ Skip to main content

Interprofessional Practice and Education in Clinical Learning Environments

Overview of attention for article published in Academic medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
57 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interprofessional Practice and Education in Clinical Learning Environments
Published in
Academic medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.1097/acm.0000000000002371
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul N. Uhlig, Joy Doll, Kristy Brandon, Christopher Goodman, Josephine Medado-Ramirez, Michael A. Barnes, Mary A. Dolansky, Temple A. Ratcliffe, Kanapa Kornsawad, W. Ellen Raboin, Maggie Hitzeman, Jeffrey Brown, Les Hall

Abstract

This Invited Commentary is written by co-authors working to implement and study new models of interprofessional practice and education in clinical learning environments. There are many definitions and models of collaborative care, but the essential element is a spirit of collaboration and shared learning among health professionals, patients, and family members. This work is challenging, yet the benefits are striking. Patients and family members feel seen, heard, and understood. Health care professionals are able to contribute and feel appreciated in satisfying ways. Learners feel included. Care interactions are richer and less hierarchical, and human dimensions are more central. A crucial insight is that collaborative care requires psychological safety, so that people feel safe to speak up, ask questions, and make suggestions. The most important transformation is actively engaging patients and families as true partners in care creation. A leveling occurs between patients, family members, and health professionals, resulting from closer connections, deeper understandings, and greater mutual appreciation. Leadership happens at all levels in collaborative care, requiring team-level capabilities that can be learned and modeled, including patience, curiosity, and sharing power. These abilities grow as teams work and learn together, and can be intentionally advanced by reconfiguring organizational structures and care routines to support collective team reflection. Collaborative care requires awareness and deliberate practice both individually and as a team together. Respectful work is required and setbacks should be considered normal at first. Once people have experienced the benefits of collaborative care, they "never want to go back."Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a "work of the United States Government" for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 7 8%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 27 30%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 19%
Psychology 7 8%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 21 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,173,134
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Academic medicine
#490
of 6,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,162
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic medicine
#19
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.