You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Loss‐Gain Calculator for Biodiversity Offsets and the Circumstances in Which No Net Loss Is Feasible
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12206 |
| Authors |
Philip Gibbons, Megan C. Evans, Martine Maron, Ascelin Gordon, Darren Le Roux, Amrei von Hase, David B. Lindenmayer, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 15% |
| Canada | 3 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
| Scientists | 6 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 51 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 23% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 44 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,152,712
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#578
of 1,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,272
of 291,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.